
Dear Brothers & Sisters:
We've just returned from St.
Louis after attending the 65th S.W.C.M. and I would like to share with you
some things of interest.
1. Meeting with Ben Rush,
Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Regional
Manager.
The
FRA is concentrating its field operations on Switching Operations Safety.
So far this year, there have been 10 fatalities, and 76 fatalities in the
last 2 1/2 years. Because of this, the following recommendations have
been made and the FRA field agents will be looking for strict compliance:
A. Insuring that there is good communication between the
Engineer and ground crew. A clear understanding must be had by all
concerned. Practice job briefing and have several briefings during the
course of your tour of duty.
B. Make sure that a 50 foot separation between cars is
maintained and air brakes are set before trying to adjust couplers.
C. Switching with radio communications.
(1) Always specify direction and distance, stop in 1/2
distance if radio communication ceases.
(2) Specify if you will be changing to other forms of
communication (i.e., handsignals to radio or vice versa).
D. New Hires. Never assume they know what they're
doing. Make sure they understand what's going on.
The above recommendations may sound
like a page out of the rule book and, for the most part, they are. These
are rules the government has put into place over the past few years and they
expect compliance not only from the carriers, but also from the employees.
The FRA Field Agents will be concentrating on compliance with the above when
they visit the various carrier properties and will include yard operations as
well as road operations.
2. Meeting with Railroad
Retirement Board representative, Barbara Havren.
Ms. Havren reported that our
retirement fund is solvent and should remain this way until 2025 based on its
current structure. Keep in mind that the current structure is about to
be changed, possibly today, and should be re-evaluated after all the changes
are in place. I asked her what effects the proposed changes would have
on the system if it passed, but she was instructed not to answer
questions on the "what ifs." The Board would not issue any
opinions until such time as the legislation had actually passed. (See
the attached Legislative Report for more information on this bill).
The Railroad Retirement
Board has a help line: 800-808-0772 and is available 24/7. For
those of your with internet access, go to www.rrb.gov
for more information regading Railroad Retirement.
3. Closed Meeting with
International Division Officers.
We are still negotiating a
national agreement and have a firm commitment from President Ed Dubrowski and
the other members of the negotiating team to try and bring us a good contract.
He is confident that we can make improvements in our existing agreements
because the Carriers have enjoyed 5 continuous years of steady profit.
Of course, the American Association of Railroads continues to cry poverty.
To date, the fight with the
UTU has cost us $1.63 million and is expected to continue going up because the
UTU will not back down. They are now attacking on some of the smaller
railroads in hopes of taking us back to the NMB in order to overturn the
favorable ruling we got late last year. I suspect that there is a dues
increase looming on the horizon because of this, but hopefully it won't be a
large one.
During the question and
answer session, I asked two questions:
(1)
In light of the fact that Al Gore is backing China for permanent status in the
World Trade Organization, which is, in my opinion, completely contrary to
unionism and workers rights, I asked why we (BLE) were still endorsing Mr.
Gore's candidacy? The response from President Dubrowski was that he
disagrees with Gore on this issue, so does the AFL-CIO, but after discussing
this with other labor organizations including the Teamsters, the concensus is
that Gore is not an enemy of organized labor and in the long run would help
us. As opposed to Bush and the GOP who are sworn enemies of labor.
In conversations I had with
several members, International Officers, and designated counsel, it seems evident
that one of the first things the GOP would do if Bush is elected and they
retain control of both houses will be to eliminate F.E.L.A. (Federal
Employees Liability Act). This is the protection we have as railroaders
in the event we are hurt or killed while at work. They elimination of
this law would put us under the State workman's compensation plan.
Believe me Brothers and Sisters, this would be disasterous, especially in
Texas, which has one of the lowest paying worker's comp plans in the nation.
It is believed that the next
President will appoint at least 3 new supreme court judges, possibly 4.
Remember the last judges appointed by a Republican President (Reagan), ruled
that we were allowed to sit in limbo waiting for our relief. The next
president will also appoint the FRA Administrator, National Mediation Board,
Railroad Retirement Board, Presidential Emergency Board, if needed to rule on
our new agreement, and Federal Circuit Court Judge vacancies that occur during
his term. This may not seem like much, but if you think about it, all of
these agencies and courts have and will continue to impact our working
conditions and quality of life.
(2) The
second question dealt with B.L.E. Trainmen. Where we are on this issue
and can we or can we not represent them?
The B.L.E.'s position
is that we can. At least this is the position of the International
officers. There seems to be a difference of opinion between the
International Division and various General Committees on this issue.
At any rate, the International is in the process of filing a law suit whereby
a federal court will be asked to make a determination on who can and cannot
represent trainmen.
4.
Legislative Report.
A. Power
Brake Rule. This issue is currently in committee and what we are
hoping for is to get certain language in the existing law changed so as
to give Engineers the right to refuse to take a train if air brakes, safety
devises, or other equipment doesn't work properly or is otherwise deemed to be
unsafe. This is similar to language in laws that govern airline pilots.
Currently, if an engineer takes exception with equipment and is instructed by
a company officer to leave the terminal "as is" then the engineer
cannot refuse.
B. Clean
Toilet Regulation. The B.L.E. is trying to bring about changes to
the rules that deal with sanitary conditions in locomotives to include clean,
serviced toilet facilities.
C. Crash
Worthiness of Locomotive Cabs. The crash worthiness of locomotive
cabs is also being discussed on Capitol Hill. Currently, there are
minimal requirements in place. In the past, this issue has been debated
with no success. Hopefully, we can make some progress in the near
future.
D. Air
Conditioning. Recently, Jolene Melatoris, FRA Administrator and
President Ed Dubrowski rode a train in Arizona to experience first hand the
effects of heat on crew members in locomotives. Ms. Melatoris had
promised to bring attention to the dangerously high heat levels in the cabs.
To a certain degree, this ride together with other efforts, is working to
bring about some relief. Efforts at the national level have been stepped
up to bring about a regulation that will require working air conditioners on
all lead locomotives.
E. H.R.
4844 - Railroad Retirement and Survivor's Improvement Act of 2000.
You have probably heard quite a bit about this already. As of September
27th, this bill is marked up in the Senate, meaning that it is being presented
on the Senate Floor for consideration. To date, it has the backing
of 80 of the 100 Senators, virtually assuring passage with little or no
debate. It will then be sent to the President for signature after which
it becomes law. My 2 cents worth on this issue is that for the most
part the bill has it's good points, I believe we are being short changed
because we could have gotten so much more. Compared to what the Carriers
are getting ($550 million windfall) we got very little. Nonetheless,
some of these changes were needed to help widows survive, for instance,
and should have been enacted a long time ago. I welcome the changes we
are receiving.
Conclusion
All in all, we had a very
productive meeting. Some issues were resolved and some were not. I
guess we can treat the results as a "work in progress."
Fraternally,
Larry Schneider
Legislative Rep
B.L.E., Div. 591
BACK
